{{'POUR_AMELIORER_VOTRE_EXPERIENCE' | translate}}. {{'EN_SAVOIR_PLUS' | translate}} ›
›
L’ABSP› Schakel AH., « Congruence Between European, National and Regional Elections in the European Multilevel Electoral System » (ST 6)
Schakel AH., « Congruence Between European, National and Regional Elections in the European Multilevel Electoral System » (ST 6)
Schakel AH., « Congruence Between European, National and Regional Elections in the European Multilevel Electoral System » (ST 6)
Arjan H. Schakel (Maastricht University, Pays-Bas)
The number of countries holding elections for the European Parliament has increased from 9 in 1979 to 28 in 2014. Since the 1970s, 19 European Union member states hold or have introduced elections to a regional tier of government. The electoral transformation has been accompanied by shifts in authority. The stakes in supranational and subnational elections have increased because substantial authority has shifted from the national level to the regional and European levels. Opportunities have increased for voters to express their opinion about policies and governments across electoral arenas. But in how far represent supranational and subnational election outcomes a deviation from electoral behavior in the national political arena ? In this paper I will explore differences in the vote between European, national and regional elections. Congruence between elections will be explored with the help of a number of operationalizations of dissimilarity in the vote which allows me to explore where, when and how the European vote differs from the national and regional vote in the European regions. Dissimilarity in the vote is subsequently related to various factors which are thought to impact on congruence between electoral outcomes. Special attention will be given to electoral timing (placement of an election vis-à-vis other elections), authority endowed to European and regional tiers of government (European authority index and regional authority index) and the state of the economy (economic growth and unemployment) because these are thought to have the largest impact on differences in the vote. I assess the impact of these variables by exploiting an unique dataset which contains European, national and regional election results disaggregated at the regional level for all 27 EU member states from 1979 until 2009 (Croatia which is the 28th member state and the European election of 2014 will added when the 2014 election has been held).
Section thématique 6 : Le vote différentié multi-niveau
Session unique, vendredi 11 avril 2014, 13h30-16h00
- ACCUEIL
- L’ABSP
- Groupes de travail
- Règlement organisant l’activité des groupes de travail
- Action publique
- Démocratie
- Elections, partis & opinion publique
- Europe
- Fédéralismes, régionalismes & décentralisations
- Genre & politique
- Mémoire et Politique
- Méthodes de recherche
- Migration, diversité culturelle et politique
- Questions sociales – Conflits sociaux
- REGIMEN
- Sociologie politique internationale
- Théorie politique
- PUBLICATIONS
- PRIX & SOUTIEN
- Événements
- EDT SCIENCE PO
- Contact